Town officials and a property management firm cited in a lighting incident Beach code enforcement maintain led to the death of sea turtle hatchlings agreed to a determination of "no finding of fact for violation" Wednesday.
As a result, there will be no fine, against either the owner of the property, or the property management firm, which said it had prepared the property properly for nesting season and had informed a tenant of the nesting season rules and regulations.
It was a tenant of the 3420 Estero Blvd. property owned by William Griggs that reportedly left lighting on during the turtle nest hatching on Aug. 16.
Other terms involve Town Environmental Sciences Coordinator Keith Laakkonen and Bay Pointe Property Management Broker/Owner Steve Boge working together to put an educational program on sea turtle lighting issues for other rental agencies, a combined donation be made by Bay Pointe Property Management and Griggs to Turtle Time in the amount of $500, and a combined prosecutorial fee be charged to both the property management and owner in the amount of $95.
Both parties arrived at the resolution after the hearing magistrate requested a recess to allow a caucus in attempts to reach an agreement. Prior to the decision, Town officials had recommended a violation be administered and a combined fine of $40,000 ($5,000 for each of the eight dead sea turtle hatchlings) and fees be assessed.
By his order, Magistrate Joe Madden specified there was an "uncontroverted violation" but accepted the agreement structure.
"There is a violation. It is uncontroverted by anybody here, but it must be fielded for the purposes of a repeat violation at this specific property," said Madden. "There will be no fine put in place, and this order will implement the agreement that you reached."
Wednesday's code enforcement hearing was a continuation from Sept. 12. The property management firm and property owner were cited under chapter 14 of the Town's Land Development Code section 14-75, entitled Environment and Natural Resources, Article II Sea Turtle Conservation.
During testimony, the parameters of the incident were laid out through presentations. Laakkonen said he first noticed lighting violations on the evening of Aug. 2, then noted the hatchling disorientations on Aug 16.
The light source was said to come from the interior of the home that cast a strong shadow across the property. Exterior lighting was also cited as improper and not low profile.
Defense testimony cited a Town street light as the light source and said that an Australian pine hedge acted as a deterrent to the property's lighting.
Property management also provided paperwork as proof that prior to the incident, information relating to a notice about sea turtle nesting season was posted within the building and a Town notice was within the building's welcoming packet.
Allowable exterior lights were noted to be on back order. Boge said that due to difficulty in acquiring the proper lighting, Bay Pointe maintenance workers actually removed exterior light bulbs and flipped the power breakers off for that area.
"On Aug. 6, I instructed my maintenance guys to go over to the property and remove all of the exterior light bulbs and also turn both breakers off at the front of the house," Boge said.
The tenants, who checked in on Aug. 12, were informed of the sea turtle lighting issues prior to their stay, he said.
"Somebody replaced the light bulbs and flipped down the breakers," he said when questioned by Madden as to how the exterior lights were on.
All lights were then brought up to code before the first hearing, Boge said.
As followup, a nighttime inspection at the property will be conducted by the Town in the near future.
'I will inspect it to check that it is in compliance with all the exterior fixtures turned on so that we can determine that those fixtures would be in compliance and there would be no future issues," said Laakkonen.